+86 15516432285

india crusher versus petition

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15 ...

15/05/1992  M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15) (Delhi Land Use Case: Stone Crushers) M. C. Mehta. Vs. Union of India and Others. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985 (Kuldip Singh, K. Ramaswamy JJ) 15.05.1992. ORDER. 1. We reserved judgment in these matters on April 24, 1992. We heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length for several days. We have

More

M/S. Balaji Crusher Ors. v. National Green Tribunal ...

17/10/2014  Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, 2014 (4) EFLT 417, in which it was held, following L. Chandrakumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125, that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is maintainable against the orders passed by the National Green Tribunal under the Act of 2010. The ...

More

India Crusher Versus Petition 2011 – Grinding Mill China

India Crusher Versus Petition 2011 ... the courts in India by using its power of Judicial Review or Public Interest was filed as writ petition in the Supreme Court of India to protect the Nilgiris forest .Report published in Shillong Times (Shillong) on 15-09-2011 20 Gauhati ..Further, the NGT had ordered removal of illegal stone crushers, brick kilns, tea » Learn More. Where the wild things ...

More

M/S V K Stone Crusher vs Raj State Pollution Control on 20 ...

Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders, all matters directed to be transferred to Supreme ...

More

Vishwakarma Stone Crusher vs A V V N Ltd And Ors on 17 ...

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5551/2011 S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Appl.No.5038/2011 Vishwakarma Stone Crusher Kesarpura Vs. Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Ors. Dated : 17.10.2011 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Venyankatesh Garg, for the petitioner. *** By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has beseeched to quash and set aside the order dated 19th March, 2007

More

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.825 OF 2020 GAJENDRA SHARMA ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. By this writ petition filed under Article 32 ...

More

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 755 OF 2019 MADHU SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANORANJAN SHARMA Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard learned counsel ...

More

india crusher versus competition 2011 - CAESAR Heavy

Stone Crusher Competitor India India Bmw Crusher Versus Competition India bmw crusher versus competitionur company has been devoted to mining machinery for 40 yearsith its ingenuity quality intimate service and good reputation it has aroused the backbone of chinese manufacture and won the praise of the global userse also choose us as a successful enterprise and a brightget price . Get Price ...

More

M/S. Balaji Crusher Ors. v. National Green Tribunal ...

17/10/2014  Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, 2014 (4) EFLT 417, in which it was held, following L. Chandrakumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125, that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is maintainable against the orders passed by the National Green Tribunal under the Act of 2010. The ...

More

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15 ...

15/05/1992  M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15) (Delhi Land Use Case: Stone Crushers) M. C. Mehta. Vs. Union of India and Others. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985 (Kuldip Singh, K. Ramaswamy JJ) 15.05.1992. ORDER. 1. We reserved judgment in these matters on April 24, 1992. We heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length for several days. We have

More

India Crusher Versus Petition 2011 – Grinding Mill China

India Crusher Versus Petition 2011 ... the courts in India by using its power of Judicial Review or Public Interest was filed as writ petition in the Supreme Court of India to protect the Nilgiris forest .Report published in Shillong Times (Shillong) on 15-09-2011 20 Gauhati ..Further, the NGT had ordered removal of illegal stone crushers, brick kilns, tea » Learn More. Where the wild things ...

More

M/S V K Stone Crusher vs Raj State Pollution Control on 20 ...

Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders, all matters directed to be transferred to Supreme ...

More

Vishwakarma Stone Crusher vs A V V N Ltd And Ors on 17 ...

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5551/2011 S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Appl.No.5038/2011 Vishwakarma Stone Crusher Kesarpura Vs. Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Ors. Dated : 17.10.2011 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Venyankatesh Garg, for the petitioner. *** By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has beseeched to quash and set aside the order dated 19th March, 2007

More

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.825 OF 2020 GAJENDRA SHARMA ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. By this writ petition filed under Article 32 ...

More

india crusher versus competition 2011 - CAESAR Heavy

Stone Crusher Competitor India India Bmw Crusher Versus Competition India bmw crusher versus competitionur company has been devoted to mining machinery for 40 yearsith its ingenuity quality intimate service and good reputation it has aroused the backbone of chinese manufacture and won the praise of the global userse also choose us as a successful enterprise and a brightget price . Get Price ...

More

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 755 OF 2019 MADHU SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANORANJAN SHARMA Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard learned counsel ...

More

India Crusher Versus Competition 2011

India mets crusher versuspetition 2015 . petitors of in crushers jananienterprises.co . india crusher versus petition impfarrgarten. stone mobile mfg of crushers in singapore india crusher versus competition 2011,crusher unit singapore crushed stone prices, crusher machine hot sale . cost of mets vsi crusher-heavy mining machinery 2015 . cost of.

More

india zenith crusher versus competition 2011

india sbm crusher versus competition - lathyria. Mets Crusher Inde Versuspetition. india mets crusher versuspetition 2011. Petitors Of Mets In Crushers websitetveu. india crusher versus petition 2011 the average income or lifestyle enjoyed by the rest of the 13 air 2011 sc 3361 petition was directed to be listed for In The Supreme Court Of India Civil Appellate Online Service india mets ...

More

M/S. Balaji Crusher Ors. v. National Green Tribunal ...

17/10/2014  Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, 2014 (4) EFLT 417, in which it was held, following L. Chandrakumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125, that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is maintainable against the orders passed by the National Green Tribunal under the Act of 2010. The ...

More

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15 ...

15/05/1992  M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15) (Delhi Land Use Case: Stone Crushers) M. C. Mehta. Vs. Union of India and Others. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985 (Kuldip Singh, K. Ramaswamy JJ) 15.05.1992. ORDER. 1. We reserved judgment in these matters on April 24, 1992. We heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length for several days. We have

More

Vishwakarma Stone Crusher vs A V V N Ltd And Ors on 17 ...

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5551/2011 S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Appl.No.5038/2011 Vishwakarma Stone Crusher Kesarpura Vs. Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Ors. Dated : 17.10.2011 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Venyankatesh Garg, for the petitioner. *** By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has beseeched to quash and set aside the order dated 19th March, 2007

More

Anu Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka Karnataka High ...

Get free access to the complete judgment in Anu Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine.

More

HC notice on stone crusher’s petition : The Tribune India

Tribune News Service Chandigarh, May 17 Acting on a petition by a Pathankot district stone crusher, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today issued notice of motion to Secretary, Department of Science

More

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.825 OF 2020 GAJENDRA SHARMA ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. By this writ petition filed under Article 32 ...

More

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...

VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ANR. RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. The writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct Union of India to appoint a regular Director of CBI forthwith by following the procedure laid down in section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946. Prayer has

More

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 755 OF 2019 MADHU SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANORANJAN SHARMA Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard learned counsel ...

More

Bayer Corp. v. Union of India

30/01/2015  The Supreme Court, in Bayer Corporation v. Union of India Ors., in December, 2014 upheld India’s first compulsory license by dismissing a Special Leave Petition filed by Bayer Corporation. The Apex Court upheld the decision of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board and the Bombay High Court, sanctioning the grant of a compulsory license for Bayer’s anti cancer drug ‘Nexavar’. It ...

More

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL

WRIT PETITION [CIVIL] NO. 956 OF 2020 . IN THE MATTER OF . Firoz Iqbal Khan Petitioner . Versus . Union of India anrs. ..Respondents . PRELIMINARY COUNTER AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF THE UNION OF ...

More

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15 ...

15/05/1992  M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15) (Delhi Land Use Case: Stone Crushers) M. C. Mehta. Vs. Union of India and Others. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985 (Kuldip Singh, K. Ramaswamy JJ) 15.05.1992. ORDER. 1. We reserved judgment in these matters on April 24, 1992. We heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length for several days. We have

More

Right to operate stone crushers not above right to life ...

06/12/2020  Following a plea against illegal operation of stone crushers in Haryana’s Mahendergarh, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) held that stone crushers cannot be

More

Supreme Court to hear plea seeking officially renaming ...

29/05/2020  As per reports, on 12 March 2016, the Supreme Court had dismissed a petition seeking renaming of India as Bharat. Reacting to the absurdity of the plea, the bench of Justices TS Thakur and UU Lalit asked, "Do you think we have no other work except dealing with emotional issues?”. It further admonished the petitioner - Niranjan Bhatwal, a Maharashtra-based social activist stating, "Help the ...

More

CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. et al v. Republic of India ...

13/01/2021  Petition to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award in CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd., Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, and Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited, all of Mauritius v. The Republic of India at the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

More

Explain illegal crusher zone near ... - Times of India

[email protected] Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Monday asked the Haryana government to explain its position on a plea against illegal operation of crusher zone adjoining ...

More

Petition filed in Supreme Court seeking ban on all ...

The letter petition sent to the Chief Justice of India SA Bobde also sought direction for government to demolish the building of the office of the Tabligi Jammat at Nizzamuddin in New Delhi under the provision of MCD Act. ANI photo. Share: Edited By: Ankita Bhandari @ankita_katty. Updated: Apr 07, 2020, 18:26 PM IST. Source: ANI. New Delhi: A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court ...

More

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.161 OF 2004 People’s Union for Civil Liberties and another ...Petitioners Versus Union of India and another Respondents J U D G M E N T G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. Democracy is a part of the basic structure of our Constitution and rule of law and free and fare election are basic features of democracy. Democracy postulates that there should be periodical elections so that ...

More

Bayer Corp. v. Union of India

30/01/2015  The Supreme Court, in Bayer Corporation v. Union of India Ors., in December, 2014 upheld India’s first compulsory license by dismissing a Special Leave Petition filed by Bayer Corporation. The Apex Court upheld the decision of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board and the Bombay High Court, sanctioning the grant of a compulsory license for Bayer’s anti cancer drug ‘Nexavar’. It ...

More

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...

VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ANR. RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. The writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct Union of India to appoint a regular Director of CBI forthwith by following the procedure laid down in section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946. Prayer has

More

Provision of review petition – an overview

20/08/2020  The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Lily Thomas v. Union of India, (2000) 6 SCC 224, the Supreme Court has laid down the law in the following terms: (SCC pp. 247-48, Para 52) “52. The dictionary meaning of the word ‘review’ is ‘the act of looking, offer something again with a view to correction or improvement’. It cannot be denied that the review is the creation of a statute ...

More